Defiant Islamic “Doctor”: Muslim Child Marriage “Nobody’s Business!”

In an interview published in yesterday’s Nigerian “Punch” newspaper, Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of a group called Muslim Rights Concern, or MURIC, gave an interview in which he staunchly and defiantly defended the Islamic practice of child marriage. Of course, being an Islamic “scholar”, he has little choice but to defend child marriage…since his supposedly “perfect” prophet married a six year old and deflowered her when she was nine.

Here’s a sample of his double-talk, human-rights-violating, nonsense:

“The simple truth is: Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this, particularly since 99.99 per cent of such marriages are conducted among Muslims themselves. If the man is a Muslim and the girl is also a Muslim and the girl’s parents give their approval, what is the business of any non-Muslim in that? It is sheer interference in the affair of Muslims and an attempt to exert undue influence on them.”

He repeatedly affirms, in many ways, that he, and by extension his group MURIC, have no issue with child marriage, and that any non-Muslim who has a problem with it should butt out of Muslim affairs. “Non-Muslims should therefore keep off Muslims’ affairs. Who are non-Muslims to be the judge of Muslims when every religious group has its own failings?” Yes, this argument would be successful if human rights belonged to one religion or another. But they don’t. Human rights belong to all of humanity. Human rights can be said to be absolute; beyond any religion. This is undoubtedly a foreign concept to Mr. Akintola the Islamic “doctor”…the idea of human rights. Child marriage is wrong. Period. It matters not what any religion says or does not say about it. There is, more often than not, physical, emotional, and mental trauma inflicted on these girls by their husbands. If you are in favor of engaging in child marriage, then I am going to say to you that this practice is wrong, and that you should stop it. I am NOT going to refrain from chastising the Muslim world over this dark-ages practice. I will NOT stop “poking my nose into the religious actions of Muslims” if these actions are obviously violations of basic human rights. I don’t give a damn if Mohamed did it. It’s time Ishaq Akintola and his cronies realized something billions of people figured out long ago: Mohamed was nowhere near a perfect man. He was, in many ways, utter scum. We in the west are waking up to the evils buried in Islam like a fruit crawling with maggots under the bright shiny skin. And we are not going to tolerate it.

The interviewer then continues with questions about the many cases in Nigeria where girls have been abducted, raped and forcibly converted to Islam. “Doctor” Akintola immediately goes into “defend and deny” mode:

“Which cases? Do you have the proof?… There you go again! Baseless, clueless, unfounded and untenable allegations; rumours, rumours and rumours! Where you have cases, bring them forward. You cannot turn us into suspects overnight….You are making a mountain out of a molehill and I am not under any obligation to answer that kind of question.”

Once again, OF COURSE he can’t answer that question! To do so honestly would reveal the depth of the depravity among men raised on a steady diet of Islam…and we can’t have that, now, can we? But, just because the doctor asked for it, here’s some proof for the babbling, bumbling idiot! Follow this link and read about Patience Paul, abducted by Muslims in Nigeria just six days ago for the purpose of forcible conversion.

This person, Ishaq Akintola, is no more than a gaseous windbag; an endless fountain of Islamic nonsense. I have news for you, “doctor”…the government of Nigeria would probably get along much better without the Islamically-tainted advice of MURIC. Stop worrying about Islamophobia, “doctor”, and start worrying about authentic human rights. If you don’t, you’re going to find more and more non-Muslims “sticking our noses in” and calling you out on it…because we are sick and tired of the human rights violations forced upon the world by Islam. We have had it. Stop defending the indefensible, and start working to change it. Unless of course, you’d rather the west “stuck our noses in” and changed it for you….

~Mike S.


“Like” a Facebook Post In Egypt…Go Directly To Jail!

Sometime in May of 2014, Egyptian Coptic Christian Kerolos Shouky Attallah was surfing Facebook and encountered a group called “Knights of the Cross,” a group meant to be supportive for Christian converts from Islam. He decided he agreed with the sentiments expressed by the group…and then he clicked the “Like” button. In that moment, Mr. Attallah’s life changed forever.

By the end of May, intolerant Muslims in his village of Al-Mahamid, near Luxor, discovered he had “liked” this page. As one might expect, these Muslims felt personally abused by their neighbor’s sign of utter disrespect for Islam, and they grew steadily more agitated with each passing day. Mr. Attallah realized at this point that he had made a serious error, went back to Facebook, and “unliked” the Facebook group. However, it was too late; the damage was done.

The fanatical Muslims circulated pamphlets to every Muslim in the village, inciting them to vengeance against Mr. Attallah for the gross insult he had committed against Islam…by liking the Facebook page. One leaflet read, “You will not be men if you don’t kick him out of your village.” On the morning of May 29, 2014, an explosive mob of infuriated Muslims came raging to Mr. Attallah’s doorstep. Only the intervention of the police, who, coincidentally, were there to arrest Mr. Attallah for his savage crime against humanity, saved Mr. Attallah from suffering what would have undoubtedly been a horribly brutal fate. He was the only one arrested. Neither the authors of the pamphlets nor any member of the raging mob were arrested.

The Muslims in the village found that having Mr. Attallah in jail did not heal the wounds his horrific act had created in their hearts. They discovered that terrorizing the minority Coptic Christians in the village was much more restorative for them. According to one source, “up until the day before the sentencing, Muslims were intermittently attacking Christian-owned homes and businesses, using the Facebook site as an excuse.” Several Christian-owned shops and businesses were burned to the ground by virulent mobs. All because…someone clicked “like” on a Facebook group.

On June 24th, Kerolos Shouky Attallah was sentenced to six years in prison. He was given three years for violating Article 98F of the Egypt Penal Code, defaming a divinely revealed religion, and three years for violating Article 176, inciting sectarian violence. He joins the ever-growing group of unfortunates around the world who have been unjustly deprived of freedom by the totalitarian, repressive cult of Islam. He joins Asia Bibi, slowly withering away in prison under sentence of death for blasphemy in Pakistan. He joins Gad Yunan, also a Coptic Christian from Egypt, who also received six years on a similarly bogus and trumped up blasphemy charge. He joins countless others across the Islamic world who face cruel and unusual punishments because they had an opinion contrary to that of the Muslim hive-mind. Mr. Attallah is now in prison…and his entire family’s life has been ruined…for clicking “like” on a Facebook page.

This is not some sick and depressing fiction of a warped dystopia, folks. This is reality, and it’s happening NOW, on our planet, to our fellow humans. We cannot and must not countenance this nonsense any longer. It’s time we all started calling these Islamic actions out for what they are. Blasphemy laws are anti-human rights. Blasphemy laws are the outgrowth of an insecure cult that cannot withstand any sort of logical scrutiny or questioning. Blasphemy laws are an attempt by the brainwashed to stamp out anything that might threaten their fragile programming. Everything about blasphemy laws violates any notion we in the west have of what true freedom means. It’s time we, all of us, as a group, stood up for those who have been robbed of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness by sickening blasphemy laws. Only a weak, feeble, and pathetic god (or prophet) would need protection from mocking by puny, mortal humans. And a weak, feeble god can only be a false one.

~Mike S.


Facebook: Muslim Group Urging Genocide of Ahmadi Sect “Doesn’t Violate Our Community Standards.”

In my previous post, I discussed the leader of a militant Islamic group in Hyderabad, India, Arshad Ali Qasmi, and how he was instrumental in having a publisher of civil service test study guides arrested, because the contents of the guides “hurt Muslim sentiments.” I talked about how he is the leader of a militant Islamic group with the long and tongue-tangling name of “Majlise Tahaffuze Khatme Nubuwwat Trust.” Here is the group’s description of itself, copied directly from Facebook:

“Majlis Tahaffuz e khatme Nubuwwat Trust A.P (INDIA) is establish in the year 2001. The sole purpose and mission behind the establishment is the annihilation of these destructive mischief mongers of Qadiyan, so that the boundless treasure of strong fondness for Prophet Muhammad (sw) and love of Almighty may survive and thrive among Muslims and their future generations. Thus, in this cause, MTKN has been working tirelessly towards the preservation of Khatme Nubuwwat, and the extermination of Qadianis.”

A few words of explanation: Qadiyan/Qadianis is a derogatory term for those who follow the Ahmadi sect of Islam. The issue is that the Ahmadi do not believe Mohammed was the last prophet. To most Muslims, this is heresy and blasphemy. The Quran and many hadiths have Mohammed stating that he is the last prophet. Since the Ahmadi don’t believe this, many Muslims, including this group, see them as “destructive mischief mongers.” The term Khatme Nubuwwat means the unity of Muslims in believing that Mohammed was indeed the last prophet of God. The Ahmadi are seen as spreading discord and having a negative impact on the cohesion of the Muslim Umma.

This group boldly states that their “sole purpose” behind their group is “the annihilation of these destructive mischief mongers of Qadiyan.” They claim to have been “working tirelessly towards the preservation of Khatme Nubuwwat, and the extermination of Qadianis.” Suppose someone else started a group whose sole purpose was the annihilation of these destructive mischief monger Muslims; the extermination of Muslims? Wouldn’t you think that if someone created a group like this, a group recommending genocide, that Facebook would remove it as soon as it was reported? Indeed, I know that groups like this have been removed from Facebook.

But apparently, to Mark Zuckerberg and his thoroughly dhimmified, Islam-apologist company, Ahmadi lives don’t matter. I reported the group to Facebook last night, shortly after I published my previous blog post. This morning, I received a reply. Facebook said this: “We reviewed the Page you reported for displaying hate speech and found it doesn’t violate our Community Standards.” So it appears that militant Muslims urging genocide of a persecuted sect is within Facebook’s Community Standards, and isn’t considered to be hate speech. Ridiculous, Mark Zuckerberg. You know damn well that if a group surfaced urging “annihilation” and “extermination” of Muslims, that group would be deleted immediately. Knock it off with the hypocrisy and Community Double Standards. Stand up for REAL human rights for a change. Erase this Islamic message of hate toward the Ahmadi Muslim community in India. NONE of the Muslim terrorists who have attacked the United States have been from the Ahmadi sect; just sayin.’

To everyone else who reads this: here’s a link to the page of this offensive group of Muslim haters. Go report it to Facebook. Perhaps if enough people report this page, it will indeed be removed, and you’ll have helped erase just a little of the Islamic stain from the world. No true higher spirit would recommend genocide for a group that believes differently. Religion is a creation of man; not of the higher spirit. There are many pathways to the higher spirit. None of these involve recommending extermination for some of your fellow travelers here on the planet because of their differing theologies. Report this hate-filled Islamic page. If you get the response that the page doesn’t violate Community Standards, click on the ‘frowny face’ that appears when you are asked to rate your reporting experience; then give Facebook an earful about how the page you reported supports genocide….and urging genocide against ANYONE isn’t a part of MY Community Standards.

~Mike S.

Muslim Accuser of Indian Publisher Jailed For “Hurting Sentiments”…Recommends Genocide For Ahmadi Muslims!

In Hyderabad, India, on Friday January 29th, Bandla Sai Babu, owner and editor of the publishing company Bandla Publications Private Limited, was arrested and charged with hurting the sentiments of Muslims. His publishing company publishes the study guides used by people trying to pass the Telangana State Public Service Commission (TSPSC) exams. These tests are essentially civil service exams for Telangana State, the federal division of India in which Hyderabad is located. According to his accuser, Sai Babu published a study guide in which the history of Islam was “distorted”. The book also allegedly contained “an imaginary picture of Prophet Mohammed.” Exactly why a study guide for a civil service exam would need to contain a section on Islam and Mohammed remains, at this point, a mystery. I don’t expect to ever see the exact picture of Mohammed, or be able to read the offensive words, either. Basic human rights like being confronted in public with the evidence against you don’t apply to blasphemy cases. Showing the evidence in court is considered the same thing as repeating the blasphemy all over again. One more right lost to Indians under creeping sharia.

His primary accuser is a man named Arshad Ali Qasmi. Mr. Ali Qasmi is the leader of a Muslim group called “Majlise Tahaffuze Khatme Nubuwwat Trust.” Further investigation revealed that the sole purpose of this organization is “the annihilation of these destructive mischief mongers of Qadiyan.” (Screen capture of page is below.) Qadiyani is a derogatory term used in India and Pakistan to refer to Ahmadi Muslims, a sect of Islam that believes that Mohammed was not the final prophet of God. So, to recap: The Muslim accuser, Arshad Ali Qasmi, was offended by a picture and a few words in a book, and yet he heads a group that has as its mission the genocide of Ahmadi Muslims.


You are a very disturbed person, Arshad Ali Qasmi. How DARE you preach that people need to be exterminated just because they don’t believe the same thing about Mohammed as you do! Talk about hate speech! What the hell is wrong with you? If your god recommends killing ANYONE because of their religious beliefs, then your god is false. It doesn’t get any more straight-up than that. Stop the arrogant nonsense…because a true god would NEVER want to kill Ahmadi Muslims. A true god would also never worry about a few scribblings in a stupid test manual or a picture of a 1400 years-dead pedophile. A true higher spirit would never involve itself in petty human interactions such as that. If your “sentiments” are harmed by that, then maybe you need to grow some thicker skin to shelter your precious sentiments a little better. I also hope that the Ahmadis who live in Telengana State file a FIR against YOU and have YOU thrown in jail for hurting THEIR religious sentiments. I’m sure your public threats to slaughter them all, would be considered a more hurtful thing in a fair and objective court than your little crybaby complaints about a picture and some “offensive” phrases. Get over yourself, Arshad…and get over your false religion while you’re at it.

~Mike S.

Arshad Al Qasmi, who preaches that Ahmadi Muslims must be "exterminated."
Arshad Al Qasmi, who preaches that Ahmadi Muslims must be “exterminated.”


Bonus picture of Mohammed to give Arshad Ali Qasmi another thing to get huffy about.
Bonus picture of Mohammed to give Arshad Ali Qasmi another thing to get huffy about.


A Letter To Muslim Fox Debate Participant Nabela Noor, Who Appears Ignorant of Inconvenient Islamic Facts!

Nabela Noor, the young Muslim woman who has been invited to ask a question at Thursday’s Fox/Google Republican Debate, appears to be a typical American Muslim in many ways. Her Youtube channel, which brought her to the attention of the people at Fox, consists mostly of “DIY” makeup and beauty tips. She does not wear a headcovering, although her mother does. She married a Christian man from a different background. She gives the impression that she has assimilated well into American culture as a second-generation American. She is a bubbly woman making a life of her own in the only country she has ever really known.

Dear Nabela,
I don’t doubt you when you say in your video that you are a loyal American. I understand that what you perceive as “growing Islamophobia” would bother you and your family. However, you’re ignoring the root cause of the growing fear and suspicion of Muslims. It’s not people like Trump, Cruz, and Carson. It’s not people like Pam Geller, Robert Spencer, or Mark Steyn. It’s the fact that more people are waking up to what the ideology of Islam truly believes, and the negative effect the beliefs of Islam are having on our planet.

How do you feel about the apostasy laws, where people who switch their religion from Islam are given the death penalty? These laws, directly descended from the words of Mohammed, hold sway in 19 Islamic countries. This is not a minority of extremists…it’s the governments of 19 countries! Obviously, killing someone for switching religions is a major violation of a basic human right…the right to believe what you want regarding a higher spirit. I am sure you are the kind of person who does not believe apostasy from Islam is a punishable crime. However, what YOU believe is of little consequence. Islam believes apostasy IS a crime, and freedom-loving, human-rights supporting people all over the world are waking up and soundly rejecting this idea.

What about blasphemy laws, where people are held to account for words or deeds that are seen as “injuring religious sentiments” of a Muslim by somehow insulting the prophet? Islamic blasphemy laws are enforced in 9 countries and parts of Malaysia. They are derived from reliable hadith verses in which Mohammed gave orders that those who mocked him should be killed. Illiterate children have been beaten and jailed because they unknowingly burned parts of an Islamic text in the hopes of being warm for just a little while. Asia Bibi still rots in a Pakistani jail for having the gall to claim that Jesus was better than Mohammed. I’m sure an enlightened person like you rejects the notion that people could be put in jail or even killed for the words that came out of their mouth. But, again, what you believe doesn’t really matter. Mohammed had people killed who mocked him. Blasphemy laws originate from these acts of Mohammed, and are a violation of human rights. Free speech is a cornerstone of American values. All speech, even speech that might be upsetting or unnerving to you, is protected under our Constitution and under the ethos upon which this nation was founded. It has become clear, from events in the past years, that Islam does not believe in free speech, and is quick to take offense if someone points out unwelcome truths in Islamic doctrine. People who love liberty soundly reject the idea that speaking out against ideology that is tyrannical or oppressive should be censored or punished.

You appear to be a free-spirited, independent woman. Can you honestly say you agree with the way Mohammed recommended women be treated in the quran and in hadith? Do you agree with 2:223, where it says that wives are a husband’s “tilth”, or land ready to plow, and the husband can plow his field and sow his seeds any time he likes? Do you agree with the idea that one male witness has the same reliability as two women in Islamic courts? Do you agree with Mohammed’s pronouncement that women get half as much as men when estates are settled? Do you agree with Mohammed when he says that the majority of the residents of Hell are women, and that women have half the intelligence of men? Do you agree with Mohammed when he told his men it was perfectly ok to have sex with the female prisoners they had captured? Do you agree with the Quran where it says that wives may be beaten (lightly) for non-compliance? Do you agree that women should never take a trip without a ‘mahram’, or male relative to watch over them? All of these things are in the Quran and hadith, and, like it or not, they are reflected in many Islamic countries’ versions of Sharia Law. I believe that women are equal to men, and that NO religion has the right to treat women as second class citizens before the law…or anywhere else.

What’s your opinion on the cruel and unusual punishments administered by Islamic countries? Beheading for sorcerers in Saudi Arabia, hanging for gays in Iran, chopping off the hands of thieves in Somalia…all of these punishments come straight from the prophet’s mouth. Does this truth distress you? If it does, I’m sorry. But I feel you need to be fully aware of what you are supporting. You need to think long and deeply about what Islam means to you. Do you REALLY believe all these terrible, anti-human-rights ideas would come from a perfect God and a perfect prophet? And despite what you said in your video, that Islam does not represent violence or terror, there are many, many verses in the Quran that prove you wrong. Try 9:29. Or maybe 8:12—“Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): “I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.” This sure sounds like a violent message to me! 17 of the 20 most deadly conflicts worldwide in 2015 had Muslims as combatants on one or both sides of the conflict. This does not give the desired image of a “religion of peace,” and gives the lie to your statement about Islam being violence and terror-free.

Instead of becoming a political activist to fight the false concept of “Islamophobia,” you should become a political activist to fight all the oppressive elements of Islam. I don’t know how you deal with the duality in your brain…part of your brain indoctrinated with the message “Perfect God, perfect prophet, final religion” and the other part of your brain having to constantly process the obvious wrongs contained in Islamic theology. You will never get anywhere while your mind is being pulled in two opposing directions. Abandon the falsity of Islam. Trying to defend the indefensible is a loser’s game. No, I’m not saying you should become a Christian. Christianity has its own set of issues. But I know you are intelligent enough to see the utter hypocrisy of it all. Free yourself. Be the independent woman you sometimes feel as if you are inside. You can’t put the “Islamophobia” djinn back in the bottle. Societal resistance will only grow as more people learn the truth. Stand up for true human rights instead of standing up for something that has already shown it would eradicate freedom, if given the power to do so. Free your mind of the duality. Acknowledge what you know in your heart to be true. Help the oppressed. Make a TRUE and meaningful stand for human rights…a stand against Islam. THAT would be the genuinely logical thing to do here. Thanks for listening.


Michael X Shapson

Religion of Peace? Muslims, Only 20% of Earth’s Population, Were Combatants in 85% of 2015’s 20 Deadliest Conflicts!

While Muslims only represent 20% of Earth’s population, they were involved in 85% of last year’s 20 deadliest conflicts! The details are below. I’ve included a link to each conflict in case you wish to learn more:

World’s 20 deadliest conflicts, 2015

Syrian Civil War 55,219                                                                                                                   War in Afghanistan 36,345
Iraq War 21,429
Boko Haram insurgency 11,651
Mexican Drug War 6,028
Yemeni Civil War 5,924
Somali Civil War 4,365
War in Donbass (Ukraine) 4,344
War in North-West Pakistan 3,643
South Sudanese Civil War 3,167
Turkey–PKK conflict 1,927-3,450
Libyan Civil War 2705
Sinai insurgency 2560
South Kordofan conflict 1242
War in Darfur 968
Sudanese nomadic conflicts 926
Internal conflict in Myanmar 874
Communal conflicts in Nigeria 846
Kivu conflict 787
Central African Republic conflict 475

The three conflicts in which Muslims were not involved were the Mexican Drug War, the War in Ukraine, and the Kivu Conflict. Everything else on this list has Muslims involved as participants on one or both sides of the conflict.

Many of these deadly wars are strictly Muslim-on-muslim violence: The Syrian Civil War, the War in Afghanistan, the Iraq War, the Yemeni Civil War, the Somali Civil War, the War in Northwest Pakistan, the Libyan Civil War, and the Sinai Insurgency are all strictly battles between groups of Muslims. Sometimes, as in Iraq and Yemen, the conflict is a Sunni-Shia one; in other cases the struggle is between less-radical and more-radical Muslims.

Most of the rest of these wars involve Muslim encroachment into, or attempts to dominate, non-Muslim regions. These include the Boko Haram insurgency, the South Sudanese Civil War, the Turkey—PKK conflict, the South Kordovan Conflict, the War in Darfur, the Sudanese nomadic conflicts, the internal conflict in Myanmar, the Communal conflicts in Nigeria, and the Central African Republic conflict.

I find it very ironic that the idea of Islam as a “religion of peace” is crammed down our throats by the media and government on a daily basis, and yet Muslims are implicated as aggressors in 85% of last year’s deadliest conflicts. Over 154,266 people died last year because of conflicts in which the ideologies of Islam played a central role. How many of these conflicts would never have happened if there was no such thing as the cult of Islam? How many lives would have been saved? Surely the final and perfect revelations of a REAL god would NEVER have led to this!

~Mike S.